The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.dainty Investment
High Court
28 Aug 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.dainty Investment
Date of order
28 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.dainty Investment, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
AGK 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICITON
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2318 OF 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1006 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Applicant.
Versus
M/s.Dainty Investment .. Respondent.
Mr.Ashok Kotangale for the applicant.
Mr.J.D. Mistry with Mr.Raj Darak for the
respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 28th AUGUST, 2007.
P.C. :
1. There is delay of 204 days. The tax effect
is over Rs.19,00,000/-. There is no reply filed by
the respondent to oppose the contents of affidavit
in support of the notice of motion.
2. Even otherwise, we find that the cause shown
would amount to sufficient cause. Hence, delay
condoned. The notice of motion is made absolute in
terms of prayer clause (a).
3. Office to register the appeal.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue