The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.delite Enterprises
High Court
26 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.delite Enterprises
Date of order
26 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.delite Enterprises, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: (B) Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case and in law the Hon’ble Tribunal was right in holding that the Assessing Officer cannot consider notional interest on deposit received by the Assessee Company while arriving at the fair market value u/s.23(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act?" 2.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.110 of 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Delite Enterprises ...Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr. P.S. Sahadevan, for the
appellant.
Mr.J.P. Mistri with Mr. Raj Darak for the
Respondent
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 26th February, 2009
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 26th February, 2009
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Revenue is in appeal on the following
questions:-
"Whether on the facts and in the
circumstance of the case and in law the
Hon’ble Tribunal was right in deleting the
disallowance made by the Assessing Officer
of interest paid by the Assessee Company on
borrowed funds amounting to Rs.241.10 lakhs
overlooking the fact that the borrowed funds
were used by the Assessee Company to invest
in the Capital of another Partnership Firm
and since profits derived by the Assessee
Company from a Partnership firm were exempt
from tax u/s.10(2A) of the Income-tax Act,
the interest expense related to such tax
free profits is to be disallowed u/s.14A of
the Income Tax Act?
(B) Whether on the facts and in the
circumstance of the case and in law the
Hon’ble Tribunal was right in holding that
the Assessing Officer cannot consider
notional interest on deposit received by the
Assessee Company while arriving at the fair
market value u/s.23(1)(a) of the Income-tax
Act?"
2. In so far as Question (A) is concerned, on
facts we find that there is no profit for the
relevant assessment year. Hence the question as
framed would not arise.
3. In so far as Question (B) is concerned, the
Tribunal followed the judgment of this Court in J.K.
J.K.
Investors (Bom) Ltd. 248 ITR 723 (Bom.).
Investors (Bom) Ltd. 248 ITR 723 (Bom.). Nothing
Investors (Bom) Ltd. 248 ITR 723 (Bom.).
has been brought to our notice that the ratio of
this judgment would not be applicable. In the light
of that the said question would not arise.
Consequently Appeal dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.