Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.de...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.deoralia Finance Pvt. Ltd

High Court 25 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.deoralia Finance Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
25 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.deoralia Finance Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1365 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s.Deoralia Finance Pvt. Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. Mr.K.Shivram i/b. Ajay R.singh and Paras Savla for respondent. P.C. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 25TH AUGUST, 2009 DATE : Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2.The question sought to be raised in the appeal can hardly be said to be a substantial question of law, since the Tribunal has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Manish Maheshwari Vs. ACIT, 289 ITR 341 (SC) and has also recorded a finding that the returns were filed on the basis of very papers and material which were accepted under Section 143(1)(a) of the Act. Under these circumstances, it can hardly be said that the appeal involves any substantial question of law. In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan