Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.dh...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.dharambir Manoharlal Ltd

High Court 26 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.dharambir Manoharlal Ltd
Date of order
26 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.dharambir Manoharlal Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(-1-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4399 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.876 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant Vs. M/s.Dharambir Manoharlal Ltd.....Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant. Mr. Pankaj R. Toprani, for the Respondent. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 26TH MARCH, 2009 CORAM: F.I. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 26TH MARCH, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: . The certified copy was applied for on 18th September, 2008 and was ready on 23rd September, 2008. After that the reason given is that the copy of the order of admission was also required and that is how the delay and that the order was received on 24th November, 2008. The latter part really can be no reason. 2. However, considering the facts and circumstances and for the order to be passed the delay is condoned subject to the Revenue paying to the Respondent costs quantified at Rs.10,000/- to be paid within four weeks. On failure to pay the amount of cost motion to stand dismissed for non-prosecution. If costs are paid delay condoned and appeal restored to file. (-2-) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan