The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.dharambir Manoharlal Ltd
High Court
26 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.dharambir Manoharlal Ltd
Date of order
26 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.dharambir Manoharlal Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4399 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.876 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Dharambir Manoharlal Ltd.....Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.
Mr. Pankaj R. Toprani, for the Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 26TH MARCH, 2009
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 26TH MARCH, 2009
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The certified copy was applied for on 18th September, 2008 and was ready on 23rd September,
2008. After that the reason given is that the copy
of the order of admission was also required and that is how the delay and that the order was received on 24th November, 2008. The latter part really can be
no reason.
2. However, considering the facts and
circumstances and for the order to be passed the
delay is condoned subject to the Revenue paying to
the Respondent costs quantified at Rs.10,000/- to be
paid within four weeks. On failure to pay the
amount of cost motion to stand dismissed for
non-prosecution. If costs are paid delay condoned
and appeal restored to file.
(-2-)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.