Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.du...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.duchem Laboratories Ltd

High Court 01 Jul 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.duchem Laboratories Ltd
Date of order
01 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.duchem Laboratories Ltd, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Appellant to remove all office objections within 4 weeks from today, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.2452 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s.Duchem Laboratories Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 1ST JULY, 2009 DATE : P.C. Appellant to remove all office objections within 4 weeks from today, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. In the event of removal of office objections, Registry to register appeal. In that event appellant to serve unserved respondent within four weeks from today. Hamdast allowed. In addition to hamdast service, private service by R.P.A.D./ Speed post is permitted. Appeas be placed for admission after six weeks. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan