Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.el...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.elegant Eateries Pvt. Ltd

High Court 30 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.elegant Eateries Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
30 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.elegant Eateries Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1085 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s.Elegant Eateries Pvt. Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 30TH JULY, 2009 DATE : P.C. Heard. Perused appeal. Both the authorities below have recorded concurrent finding that, on the day when loan was advanced, the assessee was not a shareholder. In that view of the matter, the Tribunal has reached to the conclusion that the provisions of Section 2(22)(e) was not attracted. The view taken by the Tribunal is reasonable and possible. In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law. No order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan