The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.esskay Impex
High Court
17 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.esskay Impex
Date of order
17 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.esskay Impex, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.452 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.131 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Esskay Impex .. Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant
None for the respondent
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & SANTOSH BORA, JJ.DATED : 17TH APRIL, 2008
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
DATED : 17TH APRIL, 2008
P.C.:
1. None appears for the respondent though
served. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is
seeking condonation of 129 days’ delay caused in
filing the Appeal. For the reasons stated in the
affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, delay
is condoned.
2
2. Place the Appeal on board for admission in
the month of July, 2008, subject to numbering.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue