Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.ex...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.excel Industries Ltd

High Court 11 Dec 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.excel Industries Ltd
Date of order
11 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.excel Industries Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 4.In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motion, the above Appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.427 OF 2005ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.189 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax, ..Appellant Vs. M/s.Excel Industries Ltd...Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.Mr.Pankaj Toprani a/w.V.B.Patel for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATE : 11TH DECEMBER, 2008 P.C. 1.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, the learned Counsel Appellant undertakes to file Vakalatnama within a period of four weeks from today. for the 2. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is :2:for filing the Appeal on the due date itself, howeverfor the reasons beyond the control of the Appellantswhich includes the administrative difficulties, theAppeal could not be filed in time. 3.We are not at all satisfied with the reasonsgiven for causing such a delay and we are not inclined to entertain the present Notice of Motion. Hence, the Notice of Motion stands dismissed. 4.In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motion, the above Appeal also stands dismissed. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan