In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.garware Polyester Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, all the above appeals stand dismissed as barred by limitation on the statement made by learned Counsel for the appellant.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.2508 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs.M/s.Garware Polyester Ltd. ..RespondentMr.S.S.Shetty for respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.2522 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs.M/s.Avik Pharmaceuticals Ltd. ..RespondentMr.Jitendra Jain i/b.Thakore Jeriwala for respondent.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.2523 OF 2008
Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant in all matters.
P.C.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 1ST JULY, 2009
DATE :
Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that no Notice of Motion has been taken out for condonation of delay in any of the above appeal. Under these circumstance, we have no option but to dismiss all the appeals. In this view of the matter, all the above appeals stand dismissed as barred by limitation on the statement made by learned Counsel for the appellant.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue