Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.ge...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.geoffrey Manners & Co. Ltd

High Court 28 Aug 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.geoffrey Manners & Co. Ltd
Date of order
28 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.geoffrey Manners & Co. Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

AGK 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICITON NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2610 OF 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1061 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Applicant. Versus M/s.Geoffrey Manners & Co. Ltd. .. Respondent. Mr.A.D. Kango for the applicant. Mr.S.M. Shah with Mr.Rajesh Shah for the respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 28th AUGUST, 2007. P.C. : 1. The delay is of 259 days. In the affidavit in support, cause shown is delay in the Ministry of Law and thereafter for want of stamp papers. No reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent contesting said affidavit. 2. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, cause shown, in our opinion, would amount to sufficient cause. Hence, delay condoned. Notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 3. Office to register the appeal. AGK 2 (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan