The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.geoffrey Manners & Co.ltd
High Court
31 Mar 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.geoffrey Manners & Co.ltd
Date of order
31 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.geoffrey Manners & Co.ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4183 OF 2005IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1389 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
M/s.Geoffrey Manners & Co.Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.A.D.Kango for the Appellant.Mr.Rajesh Shah i/b.Rajesh Shah & Co.for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATE : 31ST MARCH, 2008
P.C..Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Bythis Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seekingcondonation of delay in filing the above Appeal.However, we find that the tax effect is less thanRs.4,00,000/- in the above. In view thereof, thelearned Counsel for the Appellant does not press theabove Notice of Motion and seeks leave to withdraw the
same. The Notice of Motion is allowed to be withdrawn
and dismissed as such.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue