Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.ge...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.german Remedies Ltd

High Court 10 Apr 2007 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

10 Apr 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.german Remedies Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In the event,the copy of memo of Appeal is not served within aperiod of four weeks from today, this order shallstand vacated automatically and the Appeal will also stand dismissed without further reference to this Court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1270 OF 2003ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.345 OF 2003 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s.German Remedies Ltd. ..Applicant ..Respondent Mr.A.D.Kango for the Applicant.Mr.A.K.Jasani i/b.T.Pooran & Co. for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 10TH APRIL, 2007 P.C. Advocate for the Respondent, an acknowledge to thateffect shall be filed in the office. In the event,the copy of memo of Appeal is not served within aperiod of four weeks from today, this order shallstand vacated automatically and the Appeal will also stand dismissed without further reference to this Court. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.