In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.gitanjali Exports Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3815 OF 2008
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.3023 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income TaxVs.M/s.Gitanjali Exports Corporation Ltd. ..Respondent
..Appellant
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3816 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.3022 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income TaxVs.M/s.Gitanjali Gems Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.R.Asokan for the Appellant.Mr.S.J.Mehta for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 15TH DECEMBER, 2008
P.C.
the Appellant. Hence, the Notices of Motion are made
absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.