Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.go...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co.ltd

High Court 15 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co.ltd
Date of order
15 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: The appeal has been preferred on the following questions : "i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in deleting the additions of Rs.1.20 crores to the value of closing stock on account of Modvat credit of excise duty? ii) Whether on the facts and i...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

((-1-)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 23 OF 2001 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus M/s.Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co.Ltd. ... Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr. P.J. Pardiwala with Ms. S. Vedpathak i/by Maneksha & Sethna for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: JANUARY 15, 2008 P.C. P.C. . The appeal has been preferred on the following questions : "i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in deleting the additions of Rs.1.20 crores to the value of closing stock on account of Modvat credit of excise duty? ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the Sales Tax receipts can not form part of the total turn ((-2-)) over while computing the deduction u/s. 80HHC of the I.T. Act? iii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in setting aside the order of C.I.T. (A) and holding that the assessee is entitled to deduction u/s. 32AB inclusive of income assessable under the head "income from Other Sources"?" . In so far as question (a) is concerned, the same is covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in 261 ITR 275. . In so far as question No. 2 is concerned, the same is covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in 290 ITR 667. . In so far as question No. 3 is covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in 282 ITR 547. The questions of law as framed would not arise. Consequently appeal dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan