In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.In view of the withdrawal of the Appeal, the above Notice of Motion also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.838 OF 2004WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2058 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
M/s.Goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.A.D.Kango for the Appellant.Ms.A.Vissanji for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 25TH JUNE, 2007
P.C.
to the Appellant.
2.In view of the withdrawal of the Appeal, the
above Notice of Motion also stands dismissed.
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue