The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.hansdhwani Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd
High Court
16 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.hansdhwani Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
16 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.hansdhwani Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: (b) Whether under the provisions of section (-2-) 115JA the AO is not empowered to verify as to whether the accounts submitted by the assessee have been prepared in accordance with Part II and Part III of Schedule VI of Companies Act, 1956 especially in a case where the auditors have not expressly s...
Decision: For the same reasons we find no merit in this Appeal which is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(-1-)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.719 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Hansdhwani Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd..Respondent
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan with Mr. Vimal Gupta for the
Appellant
Mr. J.P. Mistri with Mr. P.C. Tripathi & Mr. Raj
Darak, for the Respondent
CORAM:F.I.REBELLO &R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 16th March, 2009
CORAM:
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 16th March, 2009
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The Revenue is in Appeal for the assessment
year 1999-2000 in respect of the following
questions:-
(a) Whether on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case and in law, the
Hon’ble Tribunal is right in confirming the
order of CIT (A) and dismissing the appeal
of revenue holding that the book profit as
disclosed by the assessee does not deserve
to be interfered with and thereby directing
to exclude the addition of Rs.1,08,65,420/-
made in the computation of book profit
u/s.115 JA.
(b) Whether under the provisions of section
(-2-)
115JA the AO is not empowered to verify as
to whether the accounts submitted by the
assessee have been prepared in accordance
with Part II and Part III of Schedule VI of
Companies Act, 1956 especially in a case
where the auditors have not expressly stated
as such in their audit report.
(c) Whether the AO is not authorized to
recast the profit and loss account of the
assssee by including therein certain income
of which he finds having not being included
therein and which according to the mandate
part of II and Part III of Schedule VI of
Companies Act, 1956 are includible in the
profit and loss account of the Company."
In the case of the assessee itself for the
assessment year 1998-99 in ITA No.1136/Mum/2002
dated 7th October, 2006 the Tribunal relied on the
judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Apollo
Tyres vs. C.I.T. 255 ITR 273 and held in favour of
the assessee. Revenue has not preferred any appeal
against the said order.
2. Similarly, in the case of The Commissioner
of Income-tax vs. M/s.Akshay Textiles Trading &
Agencies Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax Appeal No.607 of
(-3-)
2005 decided on 17th October, 2007 a similar
question had arisen and following the judgment in
Apollo Tyres Ltd. (supra) we had held in favour of
the assessee. For the same reasons we find no merit
in this Appeal which is accordingly dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.