In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.harvindarpal Mehta (Huf, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2048 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
M/s.Harvindarpal Mehta (HUF)
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr.Hemant Judia for respondent.
P.C.
1.Heard.
Perused appeal.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATE :
24TH NOVEMBER,2009
2.Having seen the impugned order and the reasons recorded, the view taken by the Tribunal is a reasonable and possible view. No fault can be found in the impugned order. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue