The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.healing Cross Pharma Private Limited
High Court
08 Jun 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.healing Cross Pharma Private Limited
Date of order
08 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.healing Cross Pharma Private Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax reported in 318 ITR 352, which is disputed by the Counsel for the assessee, we are inclined to allow the Notice of Motion, subject to payment of costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2686 OF 2009
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.279 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Versus
M/s.Healing Cross Pharma Private Limited
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Nitesh Joshi i/by Mr.Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &
Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, JJ.
DATE : 8[th] June, 2011.
P.C. :
1.This Notice of Motion is taken out for setting aside the order dated 1-6-2008. By the said order, the appellant was directed to remove the office objections within four weeks, failing which the appeal was to stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. In the present case, in spite of time granted by this Court, the appellant has not removed the office objections, as a result whereof the appeal came to be dismissed. Moreover, there is considerable delay in taking out the present Notice of Motion.
Though the reasons set out in the affidavit in support of the
Notice of Motion do not disclose sufficient cause, in view of the fact that the question raised in this appeal prima facie covered by a Full Bench decision of
this Court in the case of Plastibends India Limited V/s. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax reported in 318 ITR 352, which is disputed by the Counsel for the assessee, we are inclined to allow the Notice of Motion, subject to payment of costs.
2.Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b), subject to payment of costs of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to the respondent within two weeks from today.
(Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.