The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.hindalco Industries Ltd
High Court
22 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.hindalco Industries Ltd
Date of order
22 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.hindalco Industries Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: On failure to pay the costs, the Appeal to stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4347 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.3774 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Hindalco Industries Ltd. ...Respondent
Mr. J.S. Saluja, for the Appellant.
Mr.P.R. Toprani, for the Respondent
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE,JJ.
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Considering the cause shown, delay condoned
subject to the Appellant paying to the Respondent
costs quantified at Rs.2,500/- within four weeks
from today and also removing the office objections,
if any, within four weeks. Subject to the above
office to register the Appeal. On failure to pay
the costs, the Appeal to stand dismissed.
Motion stands disposed of accordingly.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue