The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.infrastructure Leasing
High Court
23 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.infrastructure Leasing
Date of order
23 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.infrastructure Leasing, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2343 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.967 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Infrastructure Leasing &
Financial <services Ltd........Respondents
Mr.Ashok Kotangale i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for the
Apellant.
Mr. Sameer Dalal for the respondents.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&A.A.SAYED,JJ.DATED: 23RD JULY,2007
A.A.SAYED
DATED: 23RD JULY,2007
P.C.:
P.C.:
. There is a delay of 189 days in preferring
the appeal. Learned Counsel produces a copy of the
affidavit of service. Counsel to file a xerox copy
of the same on record. Considering the cause shown
in our opinion the same would amount to sufficient
cause. Hence, Motion made absolute in terms of
prayer clause (a). Office to register the Appeal.
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue