The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.inter Jewels (I) Pvt.ltd
High Court
04 Dec 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.inter Jewels (I) Pvt.ltd
Date of order
04 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.inter Jewels (I) Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3264 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1978 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Vs.
M/s.Inter Jewels (I) Pvt.Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
P.C.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 4TH DECEMBER, 2008
.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Bythis Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking thecondonation of 238 days’ delay in filing the aboveAppeal. Perused the Affidavit in support of theNotice of Motion. For the reasons stated thereinsufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay.There is no case of inaction, negligence or want ofbonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the
Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer
clause (a).
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue