Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.je...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.jewel Of India

High Court 24 Apr 2007 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

24 Apr 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.jewel Of India, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL(L) NO.212 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income TaxVs.M/s.Jewel of India ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan with Mr.A.D.Kango for the Appellant.Ms.Beena Pillai i/b. D.M.Harish & Co. for theRespondent. P.C. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATE : 24TH APRIL, 2007 . The learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw the above Appeal. The Appeal isallowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.Permissible Court Fees be refunded to the Appellant, as per rules. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.