The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.j.k.industries
High Court
16 Apr 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.j.k.industries
Date of order
16 Apr 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.j.k.industries, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2230 OF 2003.ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.729 OF 2003.
The Commissioner of Income Tax..ApplicantVs.M/s.J.K.Industries..RespondentMr.Ashok Kotangale with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for theApplicant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 16TH APRIL, 2007P.C..Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant.By this Notice of Motion the Applicant is seekingcondonation of delay in filing the above Appeal.Perused the Notice of Motion and theaffidavit-in-support thereof. For the reasons statedtherein sufficient cause is made out for condoning thedelay in filing the above Appeal. There is no case ofinaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the partof the Applicant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is madeabsolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue