In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.k. Raheja Corporation Private Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.Appellant to remove all office objections within four weeks from today and get the appeals registered, failing which the appeals shall stand dismissed without any further reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1611 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1043 OF 2009
AND
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1612 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1042 of 2009
The Commissioner of Income TaxVersusM/s.K. Raheja Corporation Private Limited
..Appellant...Respondent.
Ms.Padma Divakar for the appellant.Ms.S. Vedpathak i/by Maneksha & Sethna for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 16th JUNE, 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard parties. For the reasons stated in the affidavits in support of the notices of motion, delay in filing the appeals is condoned. The notices of motion are made absolute with no order as to costs.
2.Appellant to remove all office objections within four weeks from today and get the appeals registered, failing which the appeals shall stand dismissed without any further reference to the Court.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue