Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.ka...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kanji Moorarji

High Court 31 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

31 Mar 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kanji Moorarji, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4555 OF 2007IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2632 OF 2007 WITHIN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4557 OF 2007ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2631 OF 2007 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4558 OF 2007ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2630 OF 2007 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4560 OF 2007ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2629 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs. M/s.Kanji Moorarji ..Respondent Mr.A.S.Rao for the Appellant.Mr.Atul K.Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE : 31ST MARCH, 2008 P.C. :2: stands dismissed, as no sufficient cause is shown for condoning the delay. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.