Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.ka...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kashukha Trading & Services Pvt.ltd

High Court 11 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kashukha Trading & Services Pvt.ltd
Date of order
11 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kashukha Trading & Services Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: 2.Following substantial question of law sought to be raised in the appeal : Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is right in holding that the assessee satisfied the genuineness of credit of Rs.8.92 crore introduced in the books of the assessee which were...

Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1068 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s.Kashukha Trading & Services Pvt.Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Ms.Suchitra Kamble for appellant. Mr.P.Pardiwalla, Senior Advocate i/b. Kanga & Co. for respondent. P.C. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE : 11TH AUGUST, 2009 Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2.Following substantial question of law sought to be raised in the appeal : Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is right in holding that the assessee satisfied the genuineness of credit of Rs.8.92 crore introduced in the books of the assessee which were treated as unexplained cash credit u/s.68 by the Assessing Officer ? 3.Having heard both sides and having gone through the impugned order passed by the Tribunal, it is clear that the Assessing Officer has accepted the transaction of purchases and sale of goods and the assessee himself has offered the same for taxation and if these two things are accepted, it was not open for the Assessing Officer to doubt the transaction of sale of goods and he is not empowered to hold only part of the same transaction as non genuine, particularly when part of the transaction in the form of purchase and sales have been accepted by him as a genuine transaction. The view taken by the Tribunal is a reasonable and possible view. No substantial question of law is involved in the appeal warranting admission of the same. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan