The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kirtan Trading Pvt.ltd
High Court
28 Aug 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kirtan Trading Pvt.ltd
Date of order
28 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kirtan Trading Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
AGK 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICITON
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.740 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Kirtan Trading Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent.
Mr.Ashok Kotangale for the appellant.
Mr.J.D. Mistry with Mr.Raj Darak for the respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 28TH AUGUST, 2007.
P.C. :
1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal by order
dated 4th December, 2003 was pleased to dismiss the
appeal as orders under Section 263 passed by the CIT
have been quashed by the order of the ITAT SMC Bench
Mumbai dated 19th April, 1999 in ITA Nos.3628 &
3633/Mum/92, in the case of the assessee in relation
to assessment years 1988-89. The revenue had
preferred appeal in respect of the orders of ITAT in
ITA Nos.3628 & 3633/Mum/92 in Income Tax Appeal
No.1035 of 2000 with Income Tax Appeal No.1037 of
2000. These appeals came be dismissed on 22nd
January, 2002 on the ground that there is no
substantial question of law in view of the law laid
down by the Apex Court in CIT V/s. Sarita Agarwal
[167 CTR 105].
AGK 2
2. In view of the above, question of law as
framed in this appeal will not arise. Hence, the
appeal is dismissed.
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.