The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.kopran Limited
High Court
26 Feb 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.kopran Limited
Date of order
26 Feb 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.kopran Limited, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The office objections shall be removed within a period of four weeks from today, failing which the Appeal shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution without further reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.353 OF 2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1639 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax
Versus
M/s.Kopran Limited
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Subhash S. Shetty i/by Arvind Rathod & Co., for the respondent.
CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ.
DATE : 26[th ]February, 2010.
P.C. :
1.The Notice of Motion has been taken out for condoning the delay and for restoration the appeal, which stands dismissed for non-removal of office objections in pursuance of a conditional order dated 28th April 2009. In our view, the reasons which have been indicated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion are not satisfactory. However, in the interests of justice and since the revenue implications involved in the appeal are quantified at Rs.2.68 crore, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay, subject to the payment of costs quantified at Rs.5,000/- which shall be a condition precedent. Costs shall be paid to the respondent within a period of two weeks from today. On condition of such payment, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (A) and (B). The office objections shall be removed within a period of four weeks from today, failing which the Appeal shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution without further reference to the Court.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.