Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.la...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.lake View Developers

High Court 25 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.lake View Developers
Date of order
25 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.lake View Developers, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1262 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s.Lake View Developers ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.Mr.A.K.Jasani for respondent. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 25TH AUGUST, 2009 DATE : P.C. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Having seen the findings recorded by the Tribunal, concurring with the view taken by the CIT (A) that, the appellant could have made the claim only through the application u/s.154 of the Act, it cannot be said to be a perverse finding. In this view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan