Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.le...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.lemiur Air Express

High Court 25 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.lemiur Air Express
Date of order
25 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.lemiur Air Express, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed for want of substantial question of law.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1450 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s.Lemiur Air Express ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. Ms.A.Vissanjee for respondent. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 25TH AUGUST, 2009 DATE : P.C. 1.Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2.The Tribunal, while considering the issue, in paragraph No.8 of its order, has recorded a finding reading as under: 8.........Secondly, since an estimate by the assessee has only been substituted by another estimate by the Assessing Officer it can not be said that there was any mens-rea on the part of the asessee in filing the return of undisclosed income. 3.Considering the aforesaid finding, it is not possible to hold that any substantial question of law is involved in the appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed for want of substantial question of law. No order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan