In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.little And Co, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.104 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s.Little and Co.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant.Ms.N.Mayekar i/b. Little and Co. for respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 9TH JULY, 2009
DATE :
P.C.:
Heard. Office objections are over-ruled. Appeal is taken up for hearing at the request of learned Counsel for the appellant.
2.The question sought to be raised in this appeal relates to reopening of the assessment after lapse of four years. The Tribunal has, after appreciating material and evidence before it held that there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly the relevant facts for making of an assessment. The issue involved can hardly be said as a substantial question of law. In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.