The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.mafatlal Industries Ltd
High Court
07 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.mafatlal Industries Ltd
Date of order
07 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.mafatlal Industries Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.232 OF 1997
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.232 OF 1997
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Applicant
Vs.
M/s.Mafatlal Industries Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta i/by Mr.Ram Upadhyay for the Applicant.
Ms.V.B.Patel for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 7th August, 2008
DATE : 7th August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
Mr.Gupta, the learned Counsel for the Applicant fairly
states that as the tax effect involved in this Reference
is less than Rs.4 lakhs, the Department is not keen to
proceed with the Reference. Hence, the Reference is
returned back unanswered.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue