The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.maneklal Enterprises Ltd
High Court
20 Jun 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.maneklal Enterprises Ltd
Date of order
20 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.maneklal Enterprises Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.813 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.813 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Maneklal Enterprises Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.Suraj M.Shah with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Ms.Vasanti B.Patel for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ.
DATE : 20th June, 2008
DATE : 20th June, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The
learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to
withdraw this Appeal in view of the judgment in the case
of CIT V/s.J.K.Investers (Bombay) Ltd.- 248 ITR 723,
CIT V/s.J.K.Investers (Bombay) Ltd.- 248 ITR 723,
against which the revenue had preferred the S.L.P. and
the said S.L.P. came to be dismissed by the Supreme
Court by an order dated 1st November, 2002. Appeal is
therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Permissible Court fees be refunded to the Appellant as
per the rules.
(A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.