Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.ma...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.manoj Textiles

High Court 01 Aug 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.manoj Textiles
Date of order
01 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.manoj Textiles, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1397 OF 2000 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1397 OF 2000 The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Manoj Textiles .. Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Ms.Asifa Khan for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 1st August, 2008 DATE : 1st August, 2008 DATE : 1st August, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Ms.Asifa Khan, the learned Counsel for the Respondents has pointed out that for the earlier Assessment Year viz.1987-1988 the very same issue (as raised in the present Appeal) was raised before the Tribunal and the Tribunal found that it was a mere finding of fact and had refused to refer the same as no question of law was involved. Mr.Sahadevan the learned Counsel for the Appellant is unable to point out any question of law. 2. Hence, the question raised in this Appeal is mere finding of fact. No question of law is involved in this Appeal. Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan