Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.ma...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.maruti Corporation

High Court 05 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.maruti Corporation
Date of order
05 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.maruti Corporation, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(-1-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2729 OF 2005 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1147 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant Vs. M/s.Maruti Corporation ..Respondent Mr. G.S. Bhat, for the Appellant Mr. Atul K. Jasani, for the Respondent. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE,JJ.DATED: 5TH FEBRUARY,2008 CORAM: F.I. R.S.MOHITE,JJ. DATED: 5TH FEBRUARY,2008 P.C.: P.C.: . The Revenue has preferred this Appeal against the order dated 13th January, 2005 which was passed in Miscellaneous Application No.363/Mum./2004. This Court in Chem Amit reported in 272 ITR 397 has held that an Appeal would not lie against the order passed in Miscellaneous Application. In the light of the above learned Counsel seeks leave to withdraw the Appeal along with the Motion with liberty to prefer an Appeal against the main order. With the above observation Motion as well as Appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. Refund of Court Fees as per Rules. Certified copy expedited. (-2-) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan