The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.maruti Corporation
High Court
05 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.maruti Corporation
Date of order
05 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.maruti Corporation, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2729 OF 2005
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1147 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Maruti Corporation ..Respondent
Mr. G.S. Bhat, for the Appellant
Mr. Atul K. Jasani, for the Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE,JJ.DATED: 5TH FEBRUARY,2008
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE,JJ.
DATED: 5TH FEBRUARY,2008
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The Revenue has preferred this Appeal
against the order dated 13th January, 2005 which was
passed in Miscellaneous Application
No.363/Mum./2004. This Court in Chem Amit reported
in 272 ITR 397 has held that an Appeal would not lie
against the order passed in Miscellaneous
Application. In the light of the above learned
Counsel seeks leave to withdraw the Appeal along
with the Motion with liberty to prefer an Appeal
against the main order. With the above observation
Motion as well as Appeal dismissed as withdrawn with
liberty as prayed. Refund of Court Fees as per
Rules. Certified copy expedited.
(-2-)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.