In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.metropolitan Trading Co, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: In the event, Revenue decides to move for restoration, it would be obligatory on the part of the Revenue to first inform this Court as to whether or not, the earlier order of the Tribunal for the A.Y.1998-99 has been accepted, since the Tribunal has relied on its own order passed in the assessee’s c...
Decision: 1ST JULY, 2009 DATE : Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.2201 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.
M/s.Metropolitan Trading Co.
..Appellant
..Respondent
None for the appellant.Mrs.V.B.Patel for respondent.
P.C.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 1ST JULY, 2009
DATE :
Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
In the event, Revenue decides to move for restoration, it would be obligatory on the part of the Revenue to first inform this Court as to whether or not, the earlier order of the Tribunal for the A.Y.1998-99 has been accepted, since the Tribunal has relied on its own order passed in the assessee’s case for the A.Y.1998-99 in ITA No.6213 of 2003 dated 10[th] October, 2006.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue