The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.nandosal Industries, Mumbai
High Court
22 Jul 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.nandosal Industries, Mumbai
Date of order
22 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.nandosal Industries, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such with the aforesaid liberty.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2575 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2094 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s.Nandosal Industries, Mumbai
..Appellant
..Respondent
Ms.Suchitra Kamble for appellant.Mr.J.D.Mistry i/b.Deepak Chitnis Chiparikar & Co. for respondent.
P.C.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATE :- 22ND JULY, 2009
According to learned Counsel for the appellant, the jurisdiction lies in some other High Court. Hence, he seeks leave to withdraw the appeal with liberty to approach the appropriate forum. The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such with the aforesaid liberty. Permissible Court Fees be refunded to the appellant as per rules.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue