Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.ni...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.nicholas Piramal India Ltd

High Court 29 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.nicholas Piramal India Ltd
Date of order
29 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.nicholas Piramal India Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1602 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax... Appellant Versus M/s.Nicholas Piramal India Ltd.....Respondent Mr.A.D. Kango & Mr.P.S. Sahadevan, for the Appellants Mr. A.K. Jasani with Mr. Rajesh Shah, for the Respondent CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE,JJ.DATED: 29TH JANUARY,2008 CORAM: F.I. R.S.MOHITE,JJ. DATED: 29TH JANUARY,2008 P.C.: P.C.: . The question of law as framed in this Appeal would be covered by the judgment of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs. M/s.Nicholas Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs. M/s.NicholasLPiramal India Ltd., Income Tax Appeal No.432 of2001 dated January 15, 2008. For the view taken LPiramal India Ltd., Income Tax Appeal No.432 of 2001 dated January 15, 2008. therein the question of law as framed also would be covered by the said judgment. Accordingly appeal is dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan