The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.nicholas Piramal India Ltd
High Court
29 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.nicholas Piramal India Ltd
Date of order
29 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.nicholas Piramal India Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1602 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax... Appellant
Versus
M/s.Nicholas Piramal India Ltd.....Respondent
Mr.A.D. Kango & Mr.P.S. Sahadevan, for the
Appellants
Mr. A.K. Jasani with Mr. Rajesh Shah, for the
Respondent
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE,JJ.DATED: 29TH JANUARY,2008
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE,JJ.
DATED: 29TH JANUARY,2008
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The question of law as framed in this Appeal
would be covered by the judgment of this Court in
Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs. M/s.Nicholas
Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs. M/s.NicholasLPiramal India Ltd., Income Tax Appeal No.432 of2001 dated January 15, 2008. For the view taken
LPiramal India Ltd., Income Tax Appeal No.432 of
2001 dated January 15, 2008.
therein the question of law as framed also would be
covered by the said judgment. Accordingly appeal is
dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.