The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.nitco Tiles Ltd
High Court
11 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.nitco Tiles Ltd
Date of order
11 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.nitco Tiles Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.1836 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
M/s.Nitco Tiles Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mrs.Padma Divakar for appellant.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 11TH AUGUST, 2009
DATE :
P.C.
1.Heard learned Counsel for the appellant. Office objections are overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal. At the request of learned Counsel for appellant appeal is taken up for hearing on admission.
2.We were taken through the impugned order, wherein the Tribunal has recorded a clear finding that the addition has been made without any opportunity to the assessee to rebut the statements of the third parties or to cross examine them. The revocation is in breach of principles of natural justice. Under these circumstances, the view taken by the Tribunal is a reasonable and possible view. No fault can be found with the same. In this view of the matter, the appeal is without any substance. Hence, the same stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law. No order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.