The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.nitiraj Properties Pvt.ltd
High Court
07 Aug 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.nitiraj Properties Pvt.ltd
Date of order
07 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.nitiraj Properties Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.925 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.925 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Nitiraj Properties Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.J.S.Saluja with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr.R.Murlidharan with Mr.D.Mehta i/by M/s.Dhruve
Liladhar & Co.for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 7th August, 2008
DATE : 7th August, 2008
DATE : 7th August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
Perused the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal dated 23.2.2004. The Tribunal by a detailed
analysis has found that the explanation offered by the
Assessee to be bonafide in paragraph Nos.9.4 & 9.5. It
is explicitly clear that the Tribunal has given clear
finding and has found the explanation given by the
Assessee to be bonafide. In view thereof, there is no
substantial question of law involved in this Appeal. It
merely involves the finding of fact. Hence, the Appeal
stands dismissed.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.