The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.omprakash & Co
High Court
16 Apr 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.omprakash & Co
Date of order
16 Apr 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.omprakash & Co, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3669 OF 2003.ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.1201 OF 2003.
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
M/s.Omprakash & Co.
..Applicant
..Respondent
Mrs.P.P.Bhosale with Mr.B.M.Chatterjee for theApplicant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 16TH APRIL, 2007
P.C.
1.Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant.None for the Respondent, though served. By thisNotice of Motion the Applicant is seeking condonationof delay in filing the above Appeal. Perused theNotice of Motion and the affidavit-in-support thereof.For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause ismade out for condoning the delay in filing the aboveAppeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence orwant of bonafide on the part of the Applicant. Hence,
the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of
prayer clause (a).
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue