The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.p.& O. Nedlloyd (India) Lpvt
High Court
27 Feb 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.p.& O. Nedlloyd (India) Lpvt
Date of order
27 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.p.& O. Nedlloyd (India) Lpvt, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3344 OF 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1329 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant
Vs.
M/s.P.& O. Nedlloyd (India) LPvt.
Ltd..Respondent
Mr. R.Ashokan and Mr. P.S. Sahadevan, for the
Appellant.
Mr. J.D. Mistry i/b.Crawford Bayley & Co., for the
respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE,JJ.DATED: 27TH FEBRUARY,2008
R.S.MOHITE,JJ.
DATED: 27TH FEBRUARY,2008
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Considering the cause shown the same would
amount to sufficient cause. Hence delay condoned
subject to the Appellant paying to the respondents
costs quantified at Rs.7,500/- within 12 weeks from
today and also removing the office objections, if
any, within 12 weeks from today. The period of 12
weeks is granted as the Revenue has expressed some
difficulties in getting the orders to pay the costs.
Earlier we used to grant six weeks time. We have
extended the period to 12 seeks with the clear
understanding that no application for extension will
be entertained. Office to register the Appeal.
(-2-)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.