The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.pallavi Holdings Pvt.ltd
High Court
02 Jul 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.pallavi Holdings Pvt.ltd
Date of order
02 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.pallavi Holdings Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Learnedcounsel for appellant concedes this fact.Accordingly, appeal is dismissed in terms ofthe abovementioned decision.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.521 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income TaxCentral IIAppellantversusM/s.Pallavi Holdings Pvt.Ltd.32, Madhuli, 3rd floor,ABN Road, Opp. Nehru Centre,Worli, Mumbai 400 018.Respondent
Mrs.Poonam Bhosale, APP for appellant.Mr.Atul Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI ANDSMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, JJ.DATE : 02nd July 2008
PC :
1. Learned counsel for respondent-assesseestates that the issue involved in this appealis covered by decision of this Court in IncomeTax Appeal (L) No.2214 of 2006 dated 12th March2008 (Coram : F.I.Rebello and R.S.Mohite, JJ.)where the issue is decided against theappellant-Income Tax Department. Learnedcounsel for appellant concedes this fact.Accordingly, appeal is dismissed in terms ofthe abovementioned decision.
JUDGEJUDGE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1289 OF 2007ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.521 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income TaxCentral IIAppellantversusM/s.Pallavi Holdings Pvt.Ltd.32, Madhuli, 3rd floor,ABN Road, Opp. Nehru Centre,Worli, Mumbai 400 018.RespondentMrs.Poonam Bhosale, APP for appellant.Mr.Atul Jasani for respondent.CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI ANDSMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, JJ.DATE : 02nd July 2008PC :
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant andlearned counsel for the respondent. For thereasons stated in the affidavit in support ofthe motion, delay is condoned. Motion isdisposed of.
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue