The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.pamil Investments P. Ltd
High Court
26 Jul 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.pamil Investments P. Ltd
Date of order
26 Jul 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.pamil Investments P. Ltd, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICGTION
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 59 of 1989
The Commissioner of Income Tax
... Applicant.
vs.
M/s.Pamil Investments P. Ltd. ... Respondent
Mr. Ashok Kotangale, Sr. Counsel with Mr. D.A. Dubey i/b. K.C. Sidhwa for Applicant.
CORAM: V. C. DAGA AND A. S. AGUIAR JJ.Date: 26[th] July, 2005.
P. C.:
1. By this reference under section 256 (1) of the Income Tax Act ,1961, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the followingquestions of law for the opinion of this court: 1961, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the followingquestions of law for the opinion of this court:
“Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case,the assessee had the option to carry forward the lossrelating to short term capital assets without setting it offagainst the income under any other head in accordancewith the provisions of section 71(3) read with section 75(1)(a)(i)?
2. Heard learned counsel for both sides. Perused referenceproceedings. proceedings.
3. For the reasons recorded by us in our judgment dated 1[st] July 2005passed in Income Tax Reference No. 397 of 1988 (C.I.T. vs. M/s.passed in Income Tax Reference No. 397 of 1988 (C.I.T. vs. M/s.
Pithwa Engg. Works), wherein we have relied upon decision of thiscourt in the case of Commissioner of Income-tax v/s. CamcoColour Co., reported in ITR Vol. 254 (2002), page 565 we do notthink it necessary to answer the reference made to this Court for theAssessment Year 1981-82, having negligible tax effect.Accordingly, reference stands returned unanswered with no order asto costs.
(A. S. AGUIAR J.)
-x-
(V. C. DAGA J. )
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.