Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.pa...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.parshva Securities P.ltd

High Court 01 Aug 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.parshva Securities P.ltd
Date of order
01 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.parshva Securities P.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1247 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1247 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Parshva Securities P.Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Appellant. Mr.Sanjiv M.Shah for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 1st August, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Appeal, the Appellant has sought to raise the following two substantial questions of law:- (a) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble Tribunal has erred in upholding the order of the learned CIT (A) who had deleted the disallowance on account of bad debts relying upon the various judgments of the Tribunal Bench? (b) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble Tribunal has erred in not appreciating that the provisions of Section 36(1) (vii) do not permit an Assessee to Write Off the bad debt merely because the Assessee had written it off or recovery has become difficult and that the Assessee had to prove that the debt written off became bad? 2. Perused the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 9.5.2007, wherein, in paragraph Nos.7 & 9 the Tribunal has quoted the findings, and in view of the same, this Appeal pertains to finding of fact and there is no question of law involved in this Appeal. Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan