In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.pfizer Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motion, the above Appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3981 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.2249 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
..Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Pfizer Ltd.
..Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATE : 11TH DECEMBER, 2008
P.C.
1.Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant.
formalities which were required to be complied with by
the Revenue.
We are not at all satisfied with the reasons
:2:
given for causing such a delay and we are not inclined
to entertain the present Notice of Motion. Hence, the
Notice of Motion stands dismissed.
3.In view of the dismissal of the Notice of
Motion, the above Appeal also stands dismissed.
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue