In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.photophone Limited, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2566 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1025 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income-tax ....Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Photophone Limited............Respondent
Mr. Pankaj Kapoor for the Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Since the issue is covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in 290 ITR 667 learned Counsel seeks leave to withdraw the Motion as also the Appeal. Motion and Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of Court Fees as per Rules. Certified copy expedited.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue