Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.pi...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.pinakin Developers

High Court 05 Aug 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

05 Aug 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.pinakin Developers, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.176 OF 2002 The Commissioner of Income Tax, ..Appellant Vs. M/s.Pinakin Developers ..Respondent None for the Appellant.Mr.P.Daneil a/w.A.V.Joshi for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.DATE : 5TH AUGUST, 2008 P.C. Vakalatnama has not been filed in the above matter till today. Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed. (S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) thethethe

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.