The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.piramal Enterprises Limited
High Court
In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.piramal Enterprises Limited
Date of order
—
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.piramal Enterprises Limited, the High Court dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is thus dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.459 OF 2008WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1383 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income TaxVersusM/s.Piramal Enterprises Limited
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 22nd JUNE, 2009
P.C. :
1.Notice of motion is not on board. Taken up by consent of both the parties. By consent of parties, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The notice of motion is made absolute.
2.Registry is directed to register the appeal. The office objections are waived. By consent of both the parties, the Appeal is taken up for hearing.
2.Both parties agree that the issue sought ti be raised in this appeal is covered by the Judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s.Narendra D. Desaireported in (2008) 1 DTR Judgments (Bom) 106. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law is involved in this appeal. The appeal is thus dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue