In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.p.n.writer & Co. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.2312OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
M/s.P.N.Writer & Co. Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant.
Mrs.V.B.Patel for respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 1ST JULY, 2009
DATE :
P.C.
1.Office objections are overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal.
2.The issue sought to be raised in this appeal relating to the employee’s contribution to Provident Fund is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT Vs. M/s.WMI Cranes Ltd. in ITXA No.1155 of 2007 decided on 9th
October, 2007. In this view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law. No order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue